Username:    Password:
Thanks for stopping by...
Triumph of Adelaide Hills












Spanish Reds Come to Barossa












Cooler Northern End of McLaren Vale
























On Tasting
John Moody and Brave or Foolish Judging by Winestate September/October 2013 : Part 1
Thursday, 1st May, 2014  - David Farmer

John Moody age 88 in 1956

Can you make a living out of the salmon that John West rejects? I think so as while I know nothing about grading salmon I find I can discover and buy plenty of interesting wines that never make the grade in the show judging.

I have a high opinion of scientists as they place numbers on things which can be duplicated and because of that their theories and opinions make sense. As you move away from measurement by instruments and enter fields where experience and 'feeling' take over from hard numbers I get increasingly nervous.

Tasting and grading wines seems pretty simple. Presented with a long line of wines the idea is you pull forward the good wines and push back the poor ones. Then you further sub-divide the good ones. If required you then give a number to the good wines based on the system being used at that tasting. In essence this is how grading wines has developed over the last 100 years.

I developed a cautionary approach very early in my career. The light went on a great number of times and I vividly remember one moment at the National Wine Show in Canberra in the early 1980s. I was closely comparing wines in a Chardonnay class with the judging results and kept coming back to the number 3 wine which did not even rate a bronze but was my best. The wine was from the Neudorf winery, Nelson, New Zealand, a new region making wines with unfamiliar tastes.

As any winemaker knows entering shows is a lottery and being awarded no medals in Brisbane does not mean you will not do well in Adelaide. I was having a coffee with a local winemaker in Tanunda the other day and he related that at the local Barossa Show he was awarded zilch but a few weeks later and 100 kilometres away at the Adelaide Wine Show the same wines collected three gold medals.

Even so while we accept that well trained professional will make mistakes and lots of them, on the whole a group of judges should be able to indicate the better wines. It helps if the judges are given some clues such as the vintage or the variety and wines are generally grouped such that like goes with like. Without these hints the difficulty barrier is raised to high.

So a judging is seen as the best result on the day, by dedicated experienced professionals, and you must expect the results will vary between tastings.

Tastings of this nature are what I call flat tastings as they are one dimensional. Like many others I have wondered if a better method of grading is possible, one perhaps bringing in other dimensions about a wine.

This issue needs to be debated as no matter how you view judging, the results of numerous statistical studies now question whether results can be duplicated and indeed how expert are the experts.


Searching for a Three Dimensional Judging System

Here are some factors, all well known, which cause concern and might be considered in a more complex judging system which expands the ratings of a few judges. I have added a short note to clarify what is suggested though many of these points could be expanded into an essay.

1. Judging the judges. I came across this quote the other day; "A panel of 13 expert wine judges started to swirl, sniff, sip..", which tells us it is considered some tasters are rated as experts judges while others presumably have the lower rating of judges while the rest of us are amateurs or worse.

2. Comparing like with unlike wines. When appraising different styles together it is incredibly hard to have a just result. Who can say the Champion wine of a show is an old port or a young chardonnay.

3. Comparing wines from different regions or countries. Should wine from Lebanon be judged against wine from France?

4. Comparing different varieties. Can you compare a tarrango with a cabernet?

5. What is the tasting trying to achieve. Is the tasting narrowly defined or does it judge the wines of the world.

6. Comparing the ages of the wines.

7. Comparing the vintages of wines. Some vintages are better than others and if a wine from a poor vintage is judged as better than that of a greater vintage should we be concerned.

8. Should you compare wines from regions with little history with those that have a long history? In my experience it takes a long time for wines from new regions to reach a satisfactory level.

9. Does the wine already have a medal history?

10. Is the wine from a family or lineage with a long history of making great wines?

11. Does the wine have ability to age?

12. The price of the wine. This is a very contentious issue with no easy answer. Alas it must be considered as if the public are constantly told that experts cannot tell the difference between cheap and expensive wines, which is what they are now regularly told, there will be consequences.

The price the wine is sold for must be considered an important clue to wine quality though this is such an important topic it is best covered in separate articles.

13. The wine price also intermingles with the investment grade of the wine and can it be readily turned into cash.This relates back to the provenance of the wine

14. The ability of the winemaker or respective entity of the maker. Here I ponder whether a Penfolds or Guigal wine should have a rating added to the final score i.e. the issue of provenance.

15. The fashions of judging. Certain styles may be favoured which down-grades others. To think judges are unaffected by swings of fashion and practice their craft at a level floating above market swings is to not consider the problems we have in making decisions.

16. Should judges only judge what they know? I believe we all develop easily a cellar palate no matter how hard we try not to. Thus I am not a believer that all judges are equal and can be called up to tackle any wine style without fear or favour. To ask judges from Central Otago to judge Barossa wines asks for trouble.


Examples of Three Dimensional Judging

The Royal Adelaide Show has a Trophy called; the Gramp, Hardy, Hill-Smith Prize for Outstanding Wine of Provenance which was created in 2009, to recognise wines that reflect their region, lineage and longevity.

Another judging system is the Langton's Classification of Australian wine which links a lengthy history of excellence with the interests of consumers in buying the wine.

A further example is the interesting innovation of an eastern states show, from I recall the Southern Highlands, where wines in one class were from vineyards above a certain height, I think above 500 metres.

It is true that a competent judge is meant to take all of these factors into account and no doubt a good judge after a long apprenticeship can and does consider many complex factors.


Looking for a Better Way

Questions such as those listed from 1-16 illustrate some of the problems while the examples above offer imaginative ways forward. There may be a better way to explain to customers the grading of wines by moving beyond the current flat one dimensional way. This in turn made me ask did a better system of grading already exist, perhaps in education, business or science, which could be applied to wine.

After a bit of searching I stumbled across the inventiveness of John Moody who in 1900 developed a rating system for financial paper. I found his ideas had a three dimensional character to grading which offered, if not solutions for wine judging, a display of technique which could perhaps be adapted.


The Thinking of John Moody and Judging

Moody tackled the task of rating the likelihood of a borrower paying the agreed interest and the principle back on a loan. This is a grading system with money on the table and the judgements lead to real gains or losses.

Moody divides the ability of an entity to repay debt with a simple ABC rating but added lower case letters and numbers for the many sub-divisions needed to highlight variants to the basic risk.

A good example is classifying the difference in the likelihood of repayment of short term versus long term obligations.

Moody's system evolved into this grading:

Aaa

Aa1

Aa2

Aa3

A1

A2

A3

Baa1

Baa2

Baa3

Ba1

Ba2

Ba3

B1

B2

B3

Caa1

Caa2

Caa3

Ca

C


As I studied the Moody system I found it offered many parallels to wine judging and I list some of the striking features. Moody offers hundreds of indicators which he used in his rating system and below I offer seven to illustrate the complexity of his rating system.

1. Short term versus long term debt. This reminds me of the ability of a wine to age.

2. The rating of the issuer of the debt. Some issuers of debt have a poor record and I see parallels in the divergence of winemaker's abilities.

3. A sovereign state has a different ability to pay to municipals. As the classified growths and other Bordeaux's differ should we have a base rating of some regions over others?

4. The investment manager rating of the advisor to the offer. This of course points at the quality of judges and asks if they should be graded.

5. The rating of the country which considers its past history of servicing debt and outstanding debt levels. This is harder but all things being equal I would sooner cellar Australian wine than Argentinean, at this moment, on a risk reward assessment.

6. The corporate rating. This goes right to the heart of grading as a Penfolds wine is safer to buy and cellar than other companies no matter how they have been judged.

7. A speculation grade liquidity rating which is a punt on a new entity with no history. I particularly like this idea as it asks should we invest in the new region or the new wine maker.

I had these thoughts in my mind when I opened the Winestate September/October, 2013 edition and turned to 'The World's Greatest Syrah and Shiraz Challenge' with 582 wines tasted.

To say the result puzzled and disturbed me is an understatement and I will explain why in Part 2.

2
0
1
4
2
0
1
3
2
0
1
2
2
0
1
1
2
0
1
0
2
0
0
9
2
0
0
8
2
0
0
7
2
0
0
6
2
0
0
5
2
0
0
4
ON TASTING ARCHIVE 2013
Broken Glasses, Tasting Cups, Chinese Misadventures and Tailgating

Thursday, 8th August, 2013

A Wine for Richard

Monday, 5th August, 2013

Morrisons - Never Fail Method for Buying Wine

Tuesday, 9th July, 2013

Writing Tasting Notes about Great Wine

Wednesday, 2nd May, 2013

Is a Tasting Note Helpful when Shopping?

Wednesday, 24th April, 2013

Do Tasting Notes Have any Value?

Friday, 22nd March, 2013

The Five Secrets of Stylish Women Applied to Drinking Wine

Tuesday, 12th February, 2013

ON TASTING ARCHIVE 2011
Steps in Becoming a Wine Snob

Saturday, 10th December, 2011

A Morning at the Mount Barker WA Wine Show

Sunday, 20th November, 2011

Natural Flavours from Wine and Beer Yeasts

Friday, 26th August, 2011

Status in St Emilion Raises Issues

Sunday, 24th July, 2011

What Should You Pay for Great Wine?

Sunday, 15th May, 2011

ON TASTING ARCHIVE 2009
The Power of Gold

Wednesday, 25th November, 2009

First Write the Review then Taste the Wine

Wednesday, 25th November, 2009

The Artisans of the Barossa 12th September
Part 2 of the Barossa Tastings

Friday, 30th October, 2009

The Whites do go Better With Fish

Friday, 30th October, 2009

A Parker Tasting Should Make Us Pause

Tuesday, 13th October, 2009

Why You Drink Champagne by the Sea

Thursday, 8th October, 2009

Tasting at Three Barossa Wine Shows
Part 1 - The Small Winemakers Show

Sunday, 4th October, 2009

It's In The Bubbles, Stupid

Friday, 2nd October, 2009

How Good is Your Palate?

Monday, 21st September, 2009

Another Know All Wine Wanker

Monday, 21st September, 2009

Further Thoughts on the Australian Wine Show System

Thursday, 3rd September, 2009

Wine Advice from Craigslist

Thursday, 3rd September, 2009

Comparing Wine Types and Dog Breeds

Saturday, 1st August, 2009

Electronic Experts Give Wine Advice

Monday, 15th June, 2009

In Search of a Holy Grail

Monday, 5th May, 2009

The Gimblett Gravels Travelling Road Show Surprises London

Monday, 20th April, 2009

The Beauty of the Five Point Judging System

Thursday, 26th March, 2009

Ideas for a New Wine Judging Scale

Thursday, 12th March, 2009

The First Growth Gimbletts

Monday, 26th January, 2009

ON TASTING ARCHIVE 2008
The Story of One Lonely Bottle

Friday, 26th December, 2008

The Future of Capital City Wine Shows

Friday, 5th December, 2008

The More You Spend the Better the Taste

Friday, 2nd May, 2008

The Key to Tasting Wines

Friday, 11th April, 2008

Buying Wines That Have a Sense of Place

Friday, 11th April, 2008

What Are We to Make Of Wine Tasting Notes

Monday, 4th February, 2007

ON TASTING ARCHIVE 2007
Study of the Label Alters Our Tastes

Sunday, 9th December, 2007

One in Five Cannot Smell Alpha-ylangene

Monday, 24th September, 2007

Charles Must Love It

Friday, 24th August, 2007

Liking Rough Red

Thursday, 28th June, 2007

The Ultimate Masked Bottle

Firday, 24th May, 2007

Create the Atmosphere for the Tasting Result You Want

Monday, 19th March, 2007

Confessions of Wine Deceit, Other Deceptions and Fooling Yourself

Monday, 29th January, 2007

ON TASTING ARCHIVE 2006
Two Sides of the Wine Coin

Sunday, 12th November, 2006

Wine Labels, Ranking, Ratings, Experts and Wine Prices

Friday, 27th October, 2006

A Story About Verdelho

Wednesday, 4th October, 2006

The Magnetic Appeal of Wine

Sunday, 24th September, 2006

Geology Cannot be Found In Wine

Thursday, 18th September, 2006

More on the Impact of Scoring Wines Out of 100

Thursday, 14th September, 2006

How a Three Star Wine Became a 90 Point Wine

Saturday, 9th September, 2006

High Alcohol - The Debate Rolls On

Tuesday, 5th September, 2006

So You Suffer from Anosmia

Monday, 7th August, 2006

Canít Tell Your Brett from Oak Flavours

Tuesday, 18th July, 2006

Terroir - Can It Possible Shine Through the Background Noise

Tuesday, 4th July, 2006

A Little Spat Over Chateau Pavie

Thursday, 15th June, 2006

After All This Time - Now They Tell Us

Tuesday, 13th June, 2006

Winemaking and the French Touch

Friday, 9th June, 2006

The Judgement of Paris Part II

Monday, 29th May, 2006

Why Do Chardonnays Seldom Win Trophies?

Friday, 5th May, 2006

The Other French Paradox

Tuesday, 2nd May, 2006

Show Me the Chardonnay Tasting

Sunday, 30th April, 2006

Judging Wine and the View of the American 'Wine Spectator'

Thursday, 6th April, 2006

The World Versus Robert M. Parker, Part Three

Saturday, 18th March, 2006

Halliday v Parker Continues to Attract International Attention

Thursday, 5th January, 2005

ON TASTING ARCHIVE 2005
"Thank You Mr. Evans and Sorry Mr. Parker"

Thursday, 8th December, 2005

The Differences of Opinion Continue: Mount Mary Quintets vs. Robert M. Parker Jr. Part 2

Monday, 5th December, 2005

Sharp Differences of Opinion Over Mount Mary

Monday, 14th November, 2005

The Views of the Economists With a Sense of Humour

Friday, 14th October, 2005

Wine Quality: Does Terroir Matter?

Friday, 14th October, 2005

Thoughts on Wine Judging

Thursday, 13th October, 2005

What You See Affects What You Smell and Taste

Tuesday, 13th September, 2005

The New Taste of Wine

Friday, 2nd September, 2005

Consumers Disagree with Wine Experts

Saturday, 27th August, 2005

Drinking From Special Wine Glasses

Thursday, 4th August, 2005

Now, This Wine Drinks Well, Night After Night

Monday, 18th April, 2005

Corks, Stelvin Caps and Oxygen

Wednesday, 6th April 2005

A Peep Behind the Wine Show Door

Thursday, 17 March 2005

ON TASTING ARCHIVE 2004
Going To Your Second Wine Tasting

Saturday, 11th December, 2004

What You Bring to Your First Wine Tasting

Saturday, 4th December, 2004

What Do Show Medals Mean - Part 2

Tuesday, 7th December, 2004

What Do Show Medals Mean - Part 1

Friday, 3rd September, 2004



©2016 Glug  |  Contact Us  |  Privacy Policy  |   RSS Feed
Liquor Licensing Act 1997: It is an offence to sell or supply liquor to a person under the age of 18 years, or to obtain liquor on behalf of a person under the age of 18 years.
All transactions in $AUD. This web site is operated by Glug Management Company Pty Ltd ABN: 64 116 647 780 Licence No: 51401128